PURPOSE: The purpose of thisstudy is to compare the bond strength of layered ceramic to pressable and re pressable ceramic and the failure mode of thespecimen using universal testing machine and were analyzed using scanning electron microscope MATERIALS AND METHOD: The aluminum dies were fabricated according to standardized measurement of 14mm diameter and thickness of 1.3mm, internal diameter of 12mm in a disc shape. Wax patterns were fabricated for core. The wax patterns for pressable ceramicsamples (n=10) GroupI were invested followed by burnout and fresh ceramic ingots was pressed.The wax patterns for repressable ceramic samples (n=10) GroupII were invested followed by burnout and re–used ceramic ingots were collected from previously used ingots and buttons of casted restorations and they were trimmed for the excess and the removal of residues were done using 110 µm alumina particles and ultrasonic cleanse with 2%ethanol and then dried using absorbent paper and now the re–pressed ingots were prepared. layering ceramic were added with the aluminium dies fabricated according to the standardized measurement of 2mm height and 2mm of inner diameter in a cylindrical form was added to the core by conventional layering technique.Shear bond strength for each group I (n=10) and group II (n=10) were measured and compared. Sectional view of bonding interface and failure mode was observed by SEM (SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE).   RESULT: Shear bond strength values were obtained and  statistically analysed  for both within the group and between the groups using ANOVA and total was interpreted with a significance P <.000. Failure mode was determined using scanning electron microscopeGroup I – 80% adhesive failure and Group II – 90% cohesive failure. CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of the study of layered ceramic on pressed and repressed core the following conclusion are derived. Repressing of core ceramic improved the shear bond strength (SBS) of layered ceramic than pressed core ceramic. Statistical analysis obtained for both within the group and between the groups using ANOVA and total was interpreted; a significance P <.000 was determined between the results.