<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><article>
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">PIJR</journal-id>
			<journal-title>Paripex - Indian Journal Of Research</journal-title>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">2250 - 1991</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Indian Society for Health and Advanced Research</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="other">pijr-7-5-9492</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group>
					<subject>Original Research Paper</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>A STUDY ON CRANIOPLASTY USING AUTOLOGOUS BONE FLAP PRESERVED IN ABDOMINAL WALL</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>C</surname>
							<given-names>Ramasamy</given-names>
							<prefix>Dr.</prefix>
						</name>
						<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff000">
							<sup></sup>
						</xref>
						</contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub">
				<month>May</month>
				<year>2018</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>7</volume>
			<issue>5</issue>
			<fpage>01</fpage>
			<lpage>02</lpage>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT</title>
				<p><p>&nbsp;Aim and objective :</p>
<div>The aim of the present clinical study is to evaluate the efficacy of preservation of calvarial bone in an abdominal pouch for being</div>
<div>used later for cranioplasty.</div>
<div>Materials and Methods</div>
<div>All stroke and TBI patients with refractory raised ICP operated with an emergency decompressive craniectomy between july 2007</div>
<div>and Jan, 2017 at a single hospital, were included After exclusion, a total of 211 patients were taken for consideration and analysis.</div>
<div>For the retrospective analysis of the efficiency of autologous bone graft preserved in the abdominal wall, for cranioplasty, All</div>
<div>decompressive craniectomy patients who underwent subsequent cranioplasty were identified, and a database was created with</div>
<div>relevant variables, including post&ndash;operative complications. Age, gender, co&ndash;morbidity, indication for Decompressive craniectomy,</div>
<div>method of implanting in abdomen, Operating time, cranial surgery prior to Decompressive craniectomy time between</div>
<div>Decompressive craniectomy and Cranioplasty, complications like implant rejection, SSI, Osteomyelitis, and abdominal wound</div>
<div>complications if any, have all been recorded and studied.</div>
<div>Conclusion:</div>
<div>We from our retrospective analysis, conclude that storage of the patients own bone flap in the abdominal pocket is a safe, easy,</div>
<div>cheap, sterile, histocompatible, and better cosmetic results. When replacement the bone removed at craniectomy, a fresh skull</div>
<div>autograft is superior to all alternative forms of cranioplasty such as methylmetacrylate or metallic prosthesis. When compared to</div>
<div>the use of synthetic cranioplasty materials, a personal bone flap has very low percentage of inflammatory complications.</div></p>
			</abstract>			
			<counts>
				<ref-count count="7"/>
				<page-count count="2"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
</article>