A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ABDOMINAL ROUTE VS NONDESCENT VAGINAL (NDVH) ROUTE FOR HYSTERECTOMY OF FIBROID UTERUS IN A RURAL HOSPITAL IN MAHARASHTRA.

Dr. NIKHIL PANDURANG SONAWANE; Dr. AMIT SHARAD NAIK; Dr. SAUDAMINI AMIT NAIK

Volume : VII, Issue : IX, September - 2018

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ABDOMINAL ROUTE VS NONDESCENT VAGINAL (NDVH) ROUTE FOR HYSTERECTOMY OF FIBROID UTERUS IN A RURAL HOSPITAL IN MAHARASHTRA.

Dr. Nikhil Pandurang Sonawane, Dr. Amit Sharad Naik, Dr. Saudamini Amit Naik

Abstract :

Hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedure performed.The presence of uterine fioid tumour is a common finding in women of fertile age. Hysterectomy remains the treatment of choice for symptomatic patients &can be performed abdominally or vaginally or LAVH.

Objective–:The present study was undertaken with a view to compare the technical difficulties, complications and morbidity associated with vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy for enlarged fioid uterus.

Material and methods–: This prospective study was undertaken on 100 patients with 6–14 wks fioid uterus admitted in gyn ward for hysterectomy ,divided equally in two groups of 50 each undergoing abdominal hysterectomy and NDVH respectively.Observations were noted and statistical tests applied.

Conclusion–:Vaginal Hysterectomy is a better alternative to abdominal hysterectomy, for patients with moderately enlarged, mobile uterus. It has fewer intraoperative and postoperative complications.