Volume : VIII, Issue : XII, December - 2018

COMPARISON OF PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY VERSUS ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE IN ANAESTHETIZED ADULT PATIENTS.

Rahul Midha, Arvinpreet Kour, Ajaydeep Singh, Bhavika Vij

Abstract :

 Background and objectives: Endotracheal tube is always considered as the gold as it provide positive pressure ventilation under high airway pressures, avoid gastric distension, pulmonary aspiration, facilitation of suctioning, delivery of anaesthetic. The PLMA has been used to intubate, and also for airway rescue after failed intubation.¹⁷ LMA Proseal has been used successfully as a rescue device during failed rapid sequence induction in obstetric, paediatrics, and geriatric patients.

 Material and Methods: 60 adult patients of ASA I and II, age group of 18 to 70 years of either sex randomly selected and divided in group A and group B undergone general anaesthesia at Maharishi Markandeshwar institute of medical science and research, Mullana (Ambala).

 Results: Monitored intra–operatively for HR, NIBP, ETCO₂, SPO_2, at 1, 3 and 5 minutes of interval. Change in hemodynamic parameters significantly seen in group A (PLMA) HR, SBP, DBP, MAP significantly decreased at the time of induction and upto 5 minutes (p<0.05). In group B( ETT) HR, SBP, DBP, MAP significantly increased at the time of induction and upto 5 minutes (p>0.05).

Conclusion: It is concluded from our study that placement of PLMA is relatively easy, simple, and rapid for insertion and performance of PLMA is as good as the conventional ETT in providing general anaesthesia in selected conditions

Keywords :

Article: Download PDF   DOI : 10.36106/ijar  

Cite This Article:

COMPARISON OF PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY VERSUS ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE IN ANAESTHETIZED ADULT PATIENTS. , Rahul Midha, Arvinpreet Kour, Ajaydeep Singh, Bhavika Vij , INDIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH : Volume-8|Issue-12| December-2018

Number of Downloads : 589

References :