Publication ethics and malpractice statement

ISSN (Online): 2249 - 555X
Index Copernicus Value : 79.96


Guiding Principles for Authentic Publication in International Journal


IJAR - Indian Journal of Applied Research is a monthly, open access, peer reviewed international journal which Calls for Unique, Unpublished research papers in various subjects of Engineering, Management, Science, Mathematics and many other streams of knowledge. IJAR - Indian Journal of Applied Research is known for the publication of unique and authentic research articles which truly considers the copyright guidelines and to protect the rights of our authors. The research papers are written by scholars after indepth study and wish to protect the rights of use. Our dedicated team of scientists and academicians help and improve research work with cutting edge forefront innovations by avoiding plagiarism. Most of the authors represent some institutions or are guides to budding scholars and their original research work will be the base for further studies. Infringing the content of knowledge or work of other scholars will be harm to the community of education.

All submitted research articles are assessed by our Review board and Editorial board members utilizing twofold dazzle associate evaluation process so as to avoid plagiarism. IJAR - Indian Journal of Applied Research set quality standards for the acceptance of appropriate and most effective research articles. It expects from authors that they will check their compositions for written falsification test and determine they are submitting just extraordinary content for publication.


Responsibility of Authors


Expected Quality


Novelty and Plagiarism


Exposure Benchmarks


Data Access and Retention


Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication


Acknowledgement of Sources


Authority of Paper


Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects


Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest


Fundamental Errors in Published Works


Duties of Editors


Publication Decisions


Fair play


Confidentiality


Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest


Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest


Involvement and Cooperation in Investigations

An editor should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper, in conjunction with the publisher (or society). Such measures will generally include contacting the author of the manuscript or paper and giving due consideration of the respective complaint or claims made, but may also include further communications to the relevant institutions and research bodies, and if the complaint is upheld, the publication of a correction, retraction, expression of concern, or other note, as may be relevant even if it is discovered years after publication.


Duties of Reviewers
(These guidelines are based on existing Elsevier policies and COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.)


Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication, and lies at the heart of the scientific method. IJDATICS shares the view of many that all scholars who wish to contribute to publications have an obligation to do a fair share of reviewing.


Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.


Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.


Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.


Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editors attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.


Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.



With Warm Regards,

Managing Editor

IJAR - Indian Journal of Applied Research

UGC APPROVAL STATUS

  •     IJAR is a Peer-Reviewed Journal and valid as per New UGC Gazette regulations on minimum qualifications for appointment of teachers and other academic staff in universities and colleges (Date:18/07/2018) View More Detail

QUALIS APPROVED JOURNAL-BRAZIL,Click Here

X

Latest News

  • Call for Papers..

    IJAR invites high-quality Research Papers/Articles for November-2019 Issue....

    IJAR - Indian Journal of Applied Research
  • October Issue Released ...

    Now you can access October issue. We thank all our Authors for supporting our efforts in the Area of Research ....

    IJAR - Indian Journal of Applied Research
  • Read More