Volume : III, Issue : IX, September - 2013
Experimental and Numerical Comparison Between the Natural Frequency of Cracked Simply Supported Hollow and Solid Beams
Luay S. Al Ansari
Abstract :
This research presents a comparison of the natural frequency between solid and hollow simple supported cracked beam for different crack depths and positions. Three methods utilized in this research experimental and two numerical method (Rayleigh Method and Finite Element Method (using ANSYS)). The beam is made of iron with dimensions of L*W*H=(0.84*0.02* 0.02m ), and density = 7680kg/m3, E=200Gpa. A comparison made between ANSYS results with experimental results, the biggest error percentage is about (17%) in crack position (42 cm) and depth (10 mm) for the hollow beam. While the biggest error percentage between Rayleigh method with experimental results is about (29 %) for the same crack position and depth and for the hollow beam. The effect of the depth of the crack on the natural frequency of hollow beam is nearly the same effect as in the solid beam as a ratio.
Keywords :
Natural Frequency Solid Beam Hollow Beam Cracked Beam Experimental Beam Vibration Finite Element Method ANSYS Rayleigh Method.
Article:
Download PDF
DOI : 10.36106/ijar
Cite This Article:
Luay S. Al-Ansari Experimental and Numerical Comparison Between
the Natural Frequency of Cracked Simply Supported Hollow and Solid Beams Indian Journal of Applied Research, Vol.III, Issue.IX September 2013
Number of Downloads : 710
Luay S. Al-Ansari Experimental and Numerical Comparison Between the Natural Frequency of Cracked Simply Supported Hollow and Solid Beams Indian Journal of Applied Research, Vol.III, Issue.IX September 2013
Our Other Journals...
-
International Journal of
Scientific Research Visit Website -
PARIPEX Indian Journal
of Research Visit Website -
Global Journal for
Research Analysis Visit Website